During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
[단독]폴란드, 韓 해군 최초 잠수함 ‘장보고함’ 무상 양도 안받기로
Winner of the game will top the group in Super 8s。业内人士推荐谷歌浏览器【最新下载地址】作为进阶阅读
if (len1 === 0) return [];
，更多细节参见爱思助手下载最新版本
本文来自微信公众号“亿邦动力”，作者：亿邦动力，36氪经授权发布。。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
Children born after 1 January 2026 will be automatically offered two doses of the MMRV vaccine at 12 months and 18 months.